Are lithium-ion forklifts safer than diesel

The landscape of material handling equipment is undergoing a rapid transformation, driven by demands for greater operational efficiency, reduced environmental impact, and, crucially, enhanced workplace safety. For decades, diesel-powered forklifts have been the rugged standard, especially in heavy-duty, outdoor applications. However, the emergence and proliferation of lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery technology in industrial trucks present a compelling alternative, one that fundamentally shifts the safety equation.

This article provides a technical comparison of the inherent and operational safety hazards associated with lithium-ion and diesel forklifts. While both technologies are subject to rigorous safety standards, their core energy sources—a controlled chemical reaction in an internal combustion engine (ICE) versus high-density electrochemical storage—dictate distinct risk profiles. Ultimately, the question of which is "safer" is less about a universal declaration and more about the specific operational environment and the robustness of safety protocols.

�� Safety Hazards of Diesel Forklifts

Diesel forklifts, relying on an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE), introduce several well-documented hazards related to their fuel, emissions, and mechanical design.1

�� Air Quality and Respiratory Hazards

The most significant safety concern for diesel forklifts, particularly in indoor or enclosed environments, is the production of toxic exhaust emissions. The combustion process releases several dangerous gases and particulates:2

Carbon Monoxide ($\text{CO}$): A colorless, odorless gas that binds to hemoglobin in the blood, reducing oxygen-carrying capacity and leading to potential unconsciousness or death (asphyxiation risk).3

Nitrogen Oxides ($\text{NO}_{\text{x}}$): Gases like nitrogen dioxide (4$\text{NO}_2$) are respiratory irritants that can cause inflammation of the airways, leading to chronic respiratory diseases.5

Diesel Particulate Matter (6$\text{DPM}$): Microscopic soot particles, often carcinogenic, that can penetrate deep into the lungs, contributing to respiratory and cardiovascular issues.7

Sulfur Dioxide ($\text{SO}_2$): A corrosive gas that can irritate the respiratory tract and eyes.8

For indoor applications, mitigating these risks requires extensive and costly ventilation systems or the mandatory use of exhaust purifiers/catalytic converters, which still do not eliminate the risk entirely.

�� Fire and Fuel Handling Risks

The diesel fuel itself is a significant fire hazard:

Flammability: The storage, transfer, and use of liquid diesel fuel necessitate strict fire safety protocols (NFPA codes, OSHA standards).9 Fuel spills create slip hazards and major fire risks.

Hot Surfaces: The ICE and exhaust system operate at high temperatures, posing a risk of contact burns and the potential to ignite nearby combustible materials.10

Refueling Process: Refueling requires designated outdoor stations, introducing the risk of fuel spillage, ignition during transfer, and exposure to flammable vapors.

�� Noise, Vibration, and Ergonomics

Diesel engines are inherently loud, contributing to an elevated risk of occupational hearing loss for operators and nearby workers.11 The engine's operation also generates higher vibration levels compared to electric models, which can lead to increased operator fatigue and long-term musculoskeletal issues.

⚙️ Maintenance and Mechanical Risks

Regular maintenance on diesel engines involves handling hazardous fluids, such as engine oil, coolant, and hydraulic fluid, which require proper disposal and present a risk of skin contact or ingestion.12 The complexity of the ICE system means mechanical failure is a more frequent possibility compared to the simpler electric drivetrain, requiring constant monitoring of components like belts, hoses, and the fuel system.13

⚡ Safety Hazards of Lithium-Ion Forklifts

Li-ion forklifts replace the ICE with an electric motor and a high-voltage battery pack. While this eliminates all combustion-related hazards, it introduces a new set of risks centered on the battery's high energy density and electrochemical nature.

♨️ Thermal Runaway and Fire Risk

The primary technical hazard of Li-ion batteries is thermal runaway, an uncontrolled self-heating process.14 This occurs when an internal or external fault causes a cell's temperature to rise, releasing heat and triggering a cascading reaction in adjacent cells.15

The triggers for thermal runaway include:

Physical Damage: Punctures, crushes, or collisions that cause internal short circuits.16

Electrical Abuse: Overcharging, deep discharging, or using an incorrect charger, compromising the cell's integrity.17

Extreme Temperatures: Exposure to high ambient heat.18

Manufacturing Defects: Rare but significant internal flaws.

When thermal runaway occurs, the battery can vent flammable and toxic gases (a process called off-gassing), catch fire, or, in severe cases, explode.19 A significant challenge is the potential for re-ignition after the initial flames are extinguished, as the core temperature may remain high.20

�� Battery Management System (BMS) as a Safety Barrier

Modern, industrial-grade Li-ion forklift batteries are equipped with sophisticated Battery Management Systems (BMS) that serve as the primary safety mechanism against thermal runaway.21

Shutterstock

The BMS is an electronic brain that actively monitors and controls all critical parameters:

Temperature Monitoring: Sensors detect overheating in individual cells or the pack, triggering alerts and potential automatic shutdown before a critical threshold is reached.22

Voltage and Current Regulation: The BMS prevents overcharging and deep discharging—two leading causes of cell degradation and failure—by stopping the flow of electricity when limits are reached.23

Cell Balancing: It ensures all cells within the pack maintain a uniform state of charge, preventing stressed individual cells.24

Fault Diagnostics: It provides real-time error codes and alerts to the operator.25

The reliability and sophistication of the BMS are paramount to the overall safety of the Li-ion forklift.

�� Charging and Electrical Safety

While Li-ion batteries do not emit explosive hydrogen gas during charging (unlike lead-acid), the high-voltage nature of the system requires strict electrical safety:26

Charging Area: Charging can be done in a non-ventilated indoor space but must adhere to clear manufacturer guidelines regarding the charger's compatibility, cable integrity, and non-combustible placement.27

Opportunity Charging: The Li-ion ability to be "opportunity charged" during breaks is a massive operational benefit but must be managed by the BMS to prevent excessive heat buildup.28

Emergency Cut-Off: An easily accessible emergency power cut-off switch is a mandatory safety feature to isolate the high-voltage circuit in case of a fault or accident.29

⚖️ Comparative Safety Analysis

To determine the overall safer option, a comprehensive comparison must weigh the chronic, operational risks of diesel against the acute, low-frequency risks of Li-ion.

Safety Category	Diesel (ICE) Forklifts	Lithium-Ion Forklifts	Comparative Safety Assessment
Environmental/Air Quality	High risk of CO, $\text{NO}_{\text{x}}$, and DPM emissions. Unsuitable for indoor use without specialized, costly ventilation and exhaust treatment.	Zero operational emissions. Perfect for indoor use, eliminating acute and chronic respiratory hazards.	Li-ion is vastly superior due to the elimination of toxic exhaust.
Fire/Explosion Risk	High flammability of stored and used diesel fuel. Risk of ignition from hot engine surfaces.	Risk of thermal runaway leading to fire and toxic gas venting. Risk is significantly mitigated by a robust BMS and proper maintenance.	Li-ion is generally safer as the fire risk is contained to the battery pack, while diesel involves flammable fuel handling and storage across the facility.
Operational & Collision	Heavier design can lead to longer stopping distances. Engine noise reduces situational awareness.	Quieter operation requires audible warnings (e.g., blue safety lights, horns) to alert pedestrians. Generally faster acceleration requires calibrated operator training.	Comparable. Diesel's weight and Li-ion's quietness introduce different collision risks, requiring similar operational protocols.
Maintenance & Handling	Exposure to hazardous fluids (oil, coolant, acid). Complex mechanical systems requiring frequent, high-risk maintenance.	Virtually maintenance-free power source (no watering, oil changes). No exposure to corrosive or volatile liquids.	Li-ion is vastly superior, eliminating the most common and frequent maintenance-related hazards.
Regulatory & Compliance	Strict $\text{CO}$ and $\text{NO}_{\text{x}}$ monitoring is mandatory for indoor use (OSHA, EPA). Fuel storage regulations.	Compliance centers on battery charging/storage protocols and BMS integrity. New safety standards (e.g., UL 583) are emerging for Li-ion packs.	Li-ion simplifies compliance by removing the most complex atmospheric and liquid handling regulations.

The Indoor/Outdoor Dichotomy

The most critical factor in the safety comparison is the operating environment.

Indoor Operations: In warehouses, manufacturing plants, and food processing facilities, the safety advantage of Li-ion is overwhelming. The elimination of toxic emissions, high heat, and noise creates a demonstrably safer, healthier environment for all personnel.

Outdoor/Heavy-Duty Operations: Diesel retains an operational advantage in extremely rugged, 24/7 outdoor environments where refueling is faster than recharging and where emissions are dispersed. However, the inherent environmental and long-term health risks remain. Even here, Li-ion is closing the gap with robust, high-capacity packs.

Human Factors: Training and Protocols

Regardless of the power source, the most frequent cause of industrial truck incidents remains human error (collisions, tip-overs). Therefore, the overall safety of either truck is inextricably linked to:

Operator Training: Comprehensive, technology-specific training on the vehicle's unique characteristics (e.g., diesel's slow stopping versus Li-ion's quietness).

Maintenance Protocol: Adherence to manufacturer-prescribed maintenance schedules for both the ICE and the BMS.30

Facility Management: Clear traffic lanes, speed limits, and enforcement of safety rules.31

�� Conclusion

In a technical and holistic assessment of workplace safety, lithium-ion forklifts are generally safer than their diesel counterparts, particularly in indoor environments—which constitute the majority of forklift use.32

The safety of diesel forklifts is compromised by chronic, pervasive hazards: the release of toxic and carcinogenic exhaust gases and the constant presence of flammable liquid fuel.33 These risks necessitate ongoing, complex, and imperfect mitigation measures (ventilation, catalytic converters, strict refueling protocols).

In contrast, the core risks of Li-ion technology—thermal runaway—are acute, less frequent, and largely managed by sophisticated, built-in Battery Management Systems (BMS).34 The elimination of refueling hazards, corrosive liquids, and tailpipe emissions yields a direct, quantifiable improvement in air quality, fire risk, and maintenance safety.

For operations prioritizing worker health, environmental compliance, and streamlined maintenance, the shift to Li-ion is a clear step forward in creating a safer material handling ecosystem. The final verdict is that while both technologies carry risks that must be managed, the Li-ion platform fundamentally removes a host of frequent, long-term health and environmental dangers inherent to the Internal Combustion Engine.