How do diesel forklift emissions compare to electric forklifts?

I. Point-of-Use Emissions: Diesel vs. Electric

The most apparent difference between the two power sources is their direct, or "tailpipe," emissions. This is the primary consideration for indoor air quality and regulatory compliance.2

A. Diesel Forklifts: The Combustion Byproducts

Diesel forklifts, powered by internal combustion engines, use Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) fuel.3 The combustion process releases several key pollutants that pose significant risks to human health and the environment:4

Nitrogen Oxides ($\text{NO}_x$): Formed at high combustion temperatures, $\text{NO}_x$ (primarily $\text{NO}$ and $\text{NO}_2$) are ozone precursors and contribute to acid rain and smog. $\text{NO}_2$ is a direct respiratory irritant.

Particulate Matter (PM): Consisting of tiny solid particles (soot, unburned hydrocarbons, and ash), PM—especially ultrafine particles (5$\text{PM}_{2.5}$)—can penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream.6 Diesel is a significant contributor to carbonaceous PM.

Carbon Monoxide (CO): A colorless, odorless, and highly toxic gas resulting from incomplete combustion. While typically a greater problem in gasoline engines, it is present in diesel exhaust and must be controlled.

Carbon Dioxide (7$\text{CO}_2$): The primary greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted.8 The combustion of one gallon of diesel fuel releases approximately 9$22 \text{ pounds}$ of 10$\text{CO}_2$.11

B. The Role of Aftertreatment Systems

Modern diesel forklifts (typically those meeting EPA Tier 4 or EU Stage V standards) are mandated to use advanced emissions aftertreatment systems to drastically reduce these pollutants.12 These systems include:

Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC): Converts $\text{CO}$ and hydrocarbons into $\text{CO}_2$ and water.

Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF): Traps PM (soot) in a filter, which is periodically incinerated (regenerated). A functioning DPF can remove $85\%$ to $99\%$ of PM.

Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR): Uses a liquid reductant (Diesel Exhaust Fluid or DEF) to convert $\text{NO}_x$ into harmless nitrogen ($\text{N}_2$) and water.

While these technologies significantly clean the exhaust, they do not eliminate $\text{CO}_2$ or the operational complexities (e.g., DPF regeneration cycles, DEF replenishment).

C. Electric Forklifts: Zero Tailpipe Emissions

Electric forklifts, powered by high-capacity lead-acid or lithium-ion batteries, use an electric motor instead of an internal combustion engine.13

Result: They produce zero direct tailpipe emissions (14$\text{NO}_x$, 15$\text{PM}$, 16$\text{CO}$, or 17$\text{CO}_2$) during operation.18

This absolute elimination of direct pollutants makes electric forklifts the only viable choice for most indoor operations, clean environments (e.g., food processing, pharmaceuticals), and facilities where maintaining superior Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) is critical for worker health and regulatory compliance.19

II. The Well-to-Wheel (WtW) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Focusing solely on tailpipe emissions provides an incomplete picture. To truly compare the environmental impact, we must use a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework, which includes the energy chain from raw material extraction to final disposal.20

A. Defining the Scopes

The LCA is often broken down into three major emission scopes, particularly for $\text{CO}_2$:

Scope	Definition	Diesel Forklift Emissions	Electric Forklift Emissions
Scope 1 (Direct)	Emissions from the operation of owned equipment (Tailpipe).	High ($\text{CO}_2$, $\text{NO}_x$, $\text{PM}$).	Zero ($\text{CO}_2$, $\text{NO}_x$, $\text{PM}$).
Scope 2 (Indirect - Use Phase)	Emissions from the generation of purchased energy (Electricity).	Zero (Not electric).	Variable (Depends entirely on the Grid Energy Mix).
Scope 3 (Indirect - Upstream/Downstream)	Emissions from manufacturing, fuel production, and end-of-life disposal.	Moderate (Engine/chassis manufacturing, diesel refining).	High (Battery production, raw material mining).

B. Well-to-Wheel (WtW) Analysis of $\text{CO}_2$

The WtW analysis compares the total GHG impact of both fuel cycles:

Diesel WtW: Includes the energy used for drilling, transportation, refining the crude oil into diesel fuel, and the final combustion in the engine. The majority of the $\text{CO}_2$ impact (over $85\%$) occurs at the tailpipe (Scope 1).

Electric WtW: Includes the energy used to generate the electricity, transmit it to the charging station, and store it in the battery. The entire $\text{CO}_2$ impact is shifted upstream to the power generation source (Scope 2).

The key technical variable for the electric forklift is the Carbon Intensity of the Grid ($g \text{ CO}_2 / \text{kWh}$).

$$\text{Electric Forklift } \text{CO}_2 \text{ Impact} = \text{Energy Consumption (kWh)} \times \text{Grid Carbon Factor (g } \text{CO}_2 / \text{kWh)}$$

High Carbon Grid (e.g., Coal-Dominated): In regions relying heavily on fossil fuels, the electric forklift's WtW $\text{CO}_2$ emissions may approach or, in rare, inefficient cases, exceed that of a very clean, modern diesel forklift.

Low Carbon Grid (e.g., Renewable/Nuclear-Dominated): In regions with a high share of renewables, the WtW $\text{CO}_2$ emissions of the electric forklift drop dramatically, resulting in a $50\%$ to $90\%$ reduction compared to diesel.

Independent LCA studies consistently find that, even with a relatively fossil-fuel-heavy electricity grid, the overall environmental impact of an electric forklift is still significantly smaller than that of a diesel forklift over its operational lifetime, due to the inherent superior energy efficiency of the electric drive motor compared to the IC engine.21

III. The Manufacturing Footprint: A Key LCA Consideration

Electric forklifts carry a substantial initial carbon debt that must be "repaid" during their operational life. This debt is largely due to the energy-intensive process of battery manufacturing (Scope 3).

A. The Battery Production Penalty

The production of high-density battery technologies, particularly lithium-ion (Li-ion), involves:

Mining: Extraction of raw materials (lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese) is resource-intensive and has local environmental impacts.22

Cell Production: The manufacturing and assembly of battery cells require significant energy, often sourced from carbon-intensive grids (depending on the location of the battery factory).

Estimates suggest that the production phase of an electric forklift can account for around $10\%$ to $30\%$ of its total lifetime GHG emissions, primarily due to the battery.

B. The Break-Even Point

The emissions break-even point is the operating time at which the cumulative WtW $\text{CO}_2$ emissions of the electric forklift drop below the cumulative emissions of the diesel counterpart. Due to the high utilization rates of industrial equipment (forklifts operate 2,000 to 4,000 hours per year, unlike passenger cars), this break-even point is typically reached quite quickly, often within 12 to 18 months of operation, regardless of the grid mix.23

This rapid offset means that while the manufacturing footprint is real, it does not nullify the long-term environmental advantage of the electric powertrain.

---

IV. Non-GHG Environmental Factors

Emissions comparison extends beyond 24$\text{CO}_2$ and tailpipe pollutants to include other critical environmental vectors.25

A. Noise Pollution

Diesel engines are fundamentally loud due to the forces involved in combustion, often generating noise levels that require hearing protection and contribute to noise pollution in communities and workplaces.26

Diesel: Typically operates at $80 \text{ dB}$ to $100 \text{ dB}$.

Electric: Operates with minimal mechanical noise, typically 27$60 \text{ dB}$ to 28$70 \text{ dB}$.29

The reduction in noise pollution significantly improves the working environment, reducing operator fatigue and increasing safety due to better communication.30

B. Material and Waste Management

Factor	Diesel Forklift	Electric Forklift
Fluid Waste	High volumes of waste oil, oil filters, and fuel filters require specialized disposal.	Minimal fluid waste (occasional gear oil change).
Fuel Spills	Risk of diesel fuel and DEF spills, leading to potential soil and water contamination.	No risk of fuel spills.
Battery End-of-Life	Disposal of massive, worn-out lead-acid or lithium-ion batteries. Li-ion recycling infrastructure is rapidly improving, with high recovery rates for key metals.

C. The Evolution of Battery Technology

Modern battery advancements are further widening the emissions gap in favor of electric forklifts:

Lithium-Ion (Li-ion): Offers higher energy density and a longer lifespan (31$3,000+$ cycles vs. 500-1,500 for lead-acid), reducing the frequency of battery replacement and thus minimizing the Scope 3 manufacturing impact over the truck's life.32

Recycling Improvement: As battery recycling processes mature, the required input of newly mined materials decreases, further lowering the Scope 3 emissions associated with future electric forklift fleets.

V. Operational Efficiency and Emission Mitigation

The operational characteristics of electric forklifts also contribute to their lower WtW emissions.

A. Energy Efficiency

Electric motors are vastly more energy-efficient than internal combustion engines.33

IC Diesel: Converts approximately $20\%$ to $30\%$ of the fuel's chemical energy into usable kinetic energy. The rest is lost as heat and noise.

Electric Motor: Converts approximately $80\%$ to $90\%$ of the battery's electrical energy into usable kinetic energy.

This superior efficiency means that the electric forklift simply requires less primary energy (from the power plant) to perform the same amount of work, which inherently lowers its 34$\text{CO}_2$ footprint across the WtW cycle.35

B. Integration with Renewable Energy

An electric forklift fleet can be directly integrated with on-site or off-site renewable energy sources (solar, wind).36 A company that installs a solar canopy over its warehouse to charge its electric fleet achieves near-zero Scope 2 emissions, making the electric forklift's WtW footprint virtually limited to its Scope 3 manufacturing debt. This level of $\text{CO}_2}$ reduction is impossible to achieve with a diesel-powered machine.

VI. Conclusion: A Clear Trajectory Towards Electrification

The technical comparison of diesel and electric forklift emissions reveals a definitive environmental hierarchy.

The diesel forklift delivers robust power but comes with a persistent operational 37$\text{CO}_2}$ footprint (Scope 1) and unavoidable direct health and environmental hazards from 38$\text{NO}_x$ and 39$\text{PM}$.40 While modern aftertreatment systems mitigate the local air quality crisis, they cannot solve the fundamental $\text{CO}_2}$ problem inherent in burning fossil fuels.

The electric forklift offers zero operational emissions (Scope 1) and boasts vastly superior energy efficiency.41 While its initial manufacturing footprint (Scope 3) is higher due to battery production, this debt is quickly repaid during operation. Crucially, the remaining $\text{CO}_2}$ burden (Scope 2) is decoupled from the vehicle itself and is dependent on the cleanliness of the electricity grid, offering a clear and achievable path to near-zero WtW emissions through the adoption of renewable energy.

For most applications—especially indoor and mixed-use environments where air quality is paramount—the electric forklift represents the demonstrably superior, low-carbon choice, aligning with both global sustainability goals and localized health standards.42